The
election is over. Now the question is whether we will continue on the same
self-destructive course of the past decade or will we start to heal ourselves
and build for the future. Clearly America’s economic success in coming years
will rely more and more on its leadership in science and technology. But where
will that leadership come from? The cutbacks in federal research funding over
the last several years have been devastating to the nascent careers of young
scientists across the spectrum. In my own area of biomedical research funding
percentiles for NIH grants have plummeted to historic lows, with less then 10%
of new grants being funded. This is incredibly stressful for young
investigators, introducing major disruptions and uncertainties both in careers
and in the lives of young families. How can we attract the best and brightest
young people to science and technology when career prospects are so dismal?
To
ameliorate this situation we need to do several things. First, despite the
constrained fiscal climate, our political leaders need to recognize the key
role of science and technology for future economic success and begin to
re-invest in science. Second, our academic institutions need to understand that
they have engaged in a profligate overproduction of science PhDs and that the
emphasis in the future should be on quality not quantity. Third, both academia
and industry need to give some thought to mechanisms to enhance career
stability for scientists so that the loss of a grant or the end of a project
doesn’t mean the end of a career. Maybe this is a pipedream, but if we don’t
take these measures we are going to be rapidly surpassed by nations that take a
longer view of science, technology and economic growth.
No comments:
Post a Comment